Volume 06 Issue 09 September 2023
1Meredith Hollender, B.S., 2Nancy Michael
1Neuroscience and Behavior, University of Notre Dame
2PhD, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i9-12Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
The goal of the present research was to determine if a Brain-Based Growth Mindset Pilot Intervention implemented in a juvenile detention facility could change a set of beliefs surrounding self-efficacy and knowledge over one’s brain. Previous studies show that growth mindset interventions are most effective with youth from low socioeconomic households, and targeting changes in beliefs is particularly effective during adolescence because of the developmental milestones that accompany puberty. Detained juveniles tend to be adolescent minorities of low-income backgrounds with a higher number of adverse childhood experiences. Twenty-six detained juveniles participated in the pilot intervention. The intervention consisted of four, 30-minute lessons on neuroanatomy of the brain, neural plasticity, emotional regulation, and long-term neuronal development. Impact of the intervention was quantified by a Brain Health Intervention Scale (BHIS). The scale consisted of 31 affirm/deny statements that were designed to measure the knowledge gained or opinion changed by the participant about the brain. Analysis of pre- and postintervention scores on the BHIS indicate that this pilot intervention was a success with significant increases in knowledge from preintervention scores to post- intervention scores. Success in the intervention was negatively correlated with the number of previous detainments. Interventions that occur within the context of juvenile detentions must occur early, before multiple detainments have made it difficult to reverse the fixed mindset in previously detained youth. Results add further evidence that successful growth mindset interventions can be low-cost and light-touch. Brain-based growth mindset interventions must be explored early on as a diversion alternative for juvenile offenders.
KEYWORDSjuvenile detention, juvenile offenders, self-efficacy, emotional regulation, growth mindset intervention, diversion program
REFERENCES
1) The Annie E. Casey Foundation. (2019). Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative. Retrieved from: https://www.aecf.org/work/juvenile-justice/jdai/
2) The brain's reward center. (2011). In Harvard Health.
3) Business man choice vector illustration on blue background. In Shutterstock.com. Detention: St. Joseph County, IN. In Sjcindiana.com, www.sjcindiana.com/1320/Detention.
4) Good, C., Aronson, J., Inzlicht M. (2003). Improving adolescents’ standardized test performance: An intervention to reduce the effects of stereotype threat. Applied Developmental Psychology, 24, 645 – 662.
doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2003.09.002
5) Holman, B., & Ziedenberg, J. (2006). The Dangers of Detention: The Impact of Incarcerating Youth in Detention and Other Secure Facilities. Justice Policy Institute.
6) Juvenile Justice. In Youth.gov, youth.gov/youth-topics/juvenile-justice.
7) Kashani, J. H., Manning, G. W., McKnew, D. H., Cytryn, L., Simonds, J. F., & Wooderson, P.
8) C. (1980). Depression among incarcerated delinquents. Psychiatry Res, 3(2), 185-191.
9) Lamar, K. (2014). I.
10) McCord, J., Widom C.S., & Crowell N.A. (2001). Chapter 5: The Juvenile Justice System.
11) Juvenile Crime, Juvenile Justice, National Academy Press, pp. 154–227.
12) Neuron. In Flickr.com.
13) Paunesku, D., Walton, G. M., Romero, C., Smith, E. N., Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2015). Mind-set interventions are a scalable treatment for academic underachievement. Psychol Sci, 26(6), 784-793. doi:10.1177/0956797615571017
14) Pincham, H. L., Bryce, D., & Pasco Fearon, R. M. (2015). The neural correlates of emotion processing in juvenile offenders. Dev Sci, 18(6), 994-1005. doi:10.1111/desc.12262
15) Seroczynski, A. D., Evans, W. N., Jobst, A.D., Horvath, L., & Carozza, G. (2016). Reading For Life and Adolescent Re-Arrest: Evaluating a Unique Juvenile Diversion Program.
16) Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 35(3), 662-682. doi:10.1002/pam.21916 Sisk, V.F., Burgoyne, A.P., Sun J, Butler J.L., & Macnamara B.N. (2018). To What Extent and
17) Under Which Circumstances Are Growth Mind-Sets Important to Academic Achievement? Two Meta-Analyses. Psychological Science, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 549–571. doi:10.1177/0956797617739704.
18) Stokes, M. L., McCoy, K. P., Abram, K. M., Byck, G. R., & Teplin, L. A. (2015). Suicidal Ideation and Behavior in Youth in the Juvenile Justice System: A Review of the Literature. J Correct Health Care, 21(3), 222-242. doi:10.1177/1078345815587001
19) Tupac. (1995). Dear Mama.
20) Underwood, L. A., & Washington, A. (2016). Mental Illness and Juvenile Offenders.
21) International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13(2), 228. doi:10.3390/ijerph13020228
22) USC Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute. (Producer). (2017). Neurons & Synapses.
23) Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m0rHZ_RDdyQ
24) Yeager , D.S., Hanselman, P., Walton, G.M., Murray, J.S., Crosnoe, R., Muller, C., Tipton, E., Schneider, B., Hulleman, C.S., Hinojosa, C.P., Paunesku, D., Romero, C., Flint, K., Roberts, A., Trott, J., Iachan, R., Buontempo, J., Yang, S.M., Carvalho, C.M., Hahn, P.R., Gopalan, M., Mhatre, P., Ferguson, R., Duckworth, A. L., Dweck, C.S. (2019). A
25) National Experiment Reveals Where a Growth Mindset Improves Achievement. Nature, vol. 573, no. 7774, pp. 364–369. doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1466-y.
26) Ziedenberg, J. (2006). Models for Change: Building Momentum for Juvenile Justice Reform.